Presentation File

There have been many versions of the presentation file. The latest was the one used at the Institute of Energy in Hong Kong. For those who use Microsoft¡¦s Internet Explorer and who have special fonts loaded, this file is available at http://www.energyfromair.com/IOE_talk.

We assume that a presenter will be available to explain the presentation slides. Thus some details are omitted. We do not expect the average non-technical person to master the information just by reading the presentation slides.

The first group of reviewers commented that the presentation slides were excellent as revision material. However, they would confuse the first-time reader.

Sound was added to the presentation. Thus there were three versions ¡V in English, in Cantonese and in Putonghua. The updated English version is presented here.

Presenting the Lee-Tseung

Lead-Out Theory and the

Principles of the Flying Saucer

Institute of Energy

Updated on Aug 18, 2008

by Lawrence Tseung

After much discussion, we decided to add sound to the PowerPoint™ presentation and to have three versions. One is in Putonghua; one in Cantonese and one in English.

Mr. Lee Cheung Kin and Mr. Lawrence Tseung disclosed their theory via their PCT patent application in July 2006. The abstract of their patent says that they can ¡§Lead out¡¨ gravitational or electron-motion energy via pulsed oscillation, vibration, rotation or flux changes.

We are immersed in gravitational fields. If we can use such energy directly, the energy crisis of the World will be over. Mankind will have abundant, pollution-free, cheap and virtually inexhaustible energy in the foreseeable future.

This presentation starts with the simple pendulum pulled by a horizontal force. The Force, Work and Energy changes are then mathematically analyzed. The surprising result is that gravitational energy can be ¡§Led Out¡¨.

We shall start with a review of the Parallelogram of Forces, Vector Arithmetic, Resolution of Force and Displacement Vectors. We shall then introduce the concept of a Lee-Tseung Pull and what is an ideal Lee-Tseung Pull. Once we have demonstrated how gravitational energy can be led out, we extend the concept to magnetic fields and rotational systems. We then discuss some known inventions that already use this Lee-Tseung Lead-Out energy.

In this slide, we focus on overcoming the objections based on the Law of Conservation of Energy.

The Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. However, it can change from one form to another. An invention which claims to create energy from nothing will be regarded as an impossible ¡¥perpetual motion¡¦ machine.

The top figure represents a traditional system. We have 100 units of Input Energy. 10 units are used to overcome friction within the system. Only 90 units of energy can come out.

In the second figure, we have 100 units of Input Energy. The over unity device in the middle creates energy from nothing and generates over 100 units of Output Energy. Such a system is regarded as an impossible ¡¥perpetual motion¡¦ machine.

In the third figure, we have the Lead-Out-Energy invention. In such an invention, 100 units of input energy will lead out 50 units of gravitational energy. The total amount of energy entering the system is then 150 units. Thus an output of more than 100 units of energy is perfectly possible. This Lead-Out-Energy invention does not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.

The essence of the Lee-Tseung Lead-Out theory is summarized in the above slide.

When a sideways pull is applied to a simple pendulum,

The lead-out gravitational energy is equal to the vertical component of the tension of the string multiplied by the vertical displacement. 

So long as there is tension on the string, gravitational energy will be Led Out. 

The ideal Lee-Tseung Pull is when the direction of pull is tangential.

*** Most of the Lead-Out-Energy inventions use rotational systems. It is very difficult to consider a rotational system and figure out the source of it¡¦s energy. When we step back and examine the simple pendulum undergoing a sideways pull, the physics and mathematics become much easier to understand.

The above slide shows a pendulum or a swing suspended in a frame. The pendulum is stationary. There are 2 forces acting on this system. One is the weight (Mg). The other is the tension of the string (T). These two forces must be equal and opposite when there is no motion.

This slide reviews the experiment on the Parallelogram of Forces. This particular experiment, or a variation of it, is done in almost all Physics classes in Secondary Schools.

The experiment is done with three spring scales lying horizontally on a board. Large drawing pins or nails are pressed or hammered into the board. The experiment is performed as follows:

(1) The three scales are positioned as shown. One end of each scale is tied to a string with a knot in the middle.

(2) One of the scales is pinned by having a large drawing pin or nail hammered through its ring.

(3) The other two scales are pulled so that all three scales show a deflection.

(4) The two scales are then pinned down as shown in the diagram above.

(5) A piece of paper is then placed underneath the knot and the angles of the strings are then traced.

(6) The readings on the three scales are taken. Their relationships of the lines of force are recorded.

(7) These experimental readings are then compared to the calculated results as predicted by the Parallelogram of Forces.

This experiment, or variations of it, has been done millions of times over the centuries world-wide. It cannot be wrong.

The above is an actual experimental set up with three spring scales placed on a horizontal board.

The tension in the strings (forces) can be measured. The direction of these forces can be marked using the positions of the strings at the knot.

The experimental results can be compared with predictions using the Parallelogram of Forces.

The previous experiment can be modified for the pendulum and carried out as follows:

(1) The Board was placed vertically.

(2) One of the scales was replaced by a pendulum bob (60 units of weight).

(3) The initial position of the bob was Position A. There was no tension on the horizontal scale.

(4) The final position of the bob was Position B. The horizontal scale reading was 10 units.

(5) The directions of the forces at the knot were traced.

(6) The scale readings were taken.

(7) The experimental results were checked against the theoretical predictions.

This experiment and the theoretical predictions cannot be wrong.

The previous experiment illustrating parallelogram of forces can be modified for the case of the simple pendulum.

One of the spring scales is replaced by a lead weight. That effectively is the pendulum bob.

The spring Scale A is fixed in position. The spring Scale B can be pulled in various directions to illustrate the different amount of work done with different direction of pull.

The final position is as shown. The angle between the pendulum weight and the external force is 90 degrees.

In the previous slide, we can see that the pendulum bob has moved from Position A to Position B.

The vertical displacement represents an increase in Potential Energy (Mg x h). We can conclude that work must have been done. But we cannot determine exactly how much work has been done if we do not know the exact Force and/or the Displacement Functions.

This concept is extremely important. One analogy we can use to understand this concept better is that we want to go from Street One to Street Ten on the slope of a hill. We can go by car, by bus, by bicycle or on foot. We can go in a straight line or we can go in a detoured path. The exact work done or energy spent can be very different.

This shows a particular way of moving the bob or the knot from Position A to Position B.

The tension of the string T shown in Scale A is kept to 0 most of the time. This is achieved by pulling Scale B in the vertical position initially. It will take up all the weight (60 units). Vertical work will be done via Scale B.

At the final displaced Position B, the Scale B is swung back into the horizontal position. There will be no movement of the bob or knot at this final swing. Thus no work is done at the final swing. The total increase in potential energy of the bob (Mg x h) is supplied externally via Scale B.

*** No gravitational energy is led out in this case. Remember that if there is no tension in Scale A, no gravitational energy will be led out.

This slide shows an erratic path. This path uses much more energy than the previous slide. There will be vibrating or oscillating motion to dissipate the excess energy.

This confirms the observation that different Force or Displacement Functions will perform different quantities of work (or use different quantities of energy).

This slide shows the experiment where we are trying to keep the readings of both Scale A and Scale B the same at all times.

Scale B shows the external force being applied. This external force does work.

However, some of the work must have been done by Gravity via the Tension of the String as indicated by Scale A.

The string carries a force which can be resolved into vertical and horizontal components. It also has undergone a displacement which can also be resolved into vertical and horizontal movements. Thus, we can calculate the Work Done in both the vertical and the horizontal directions.

This slide demonstrates that the string must contribute to the Work Done. In other words, Work is being performed by Gravity through the mechanism of the string.

In this experiment, Scale B is held at an angle such that the readings on Scale A and that on Scale B are approximately equal until the end.

External energy is supplied via Scale B.

However, the tension of the string indicated by Scale A must also do work. Basic school Physics shows that work must have been done if there was Force and a Displacement at an angle to that Force.

The energy supplied via Scale A comes from Gravity. This is the ¡¥Lead-Out¡¦ energy.

This figure shows the fourth and fifth way of pulling the pendulum from position A to position B.

In summary, the various ways are:

1. Pull the pendulum bob up with Scale B. This removes all tension from the string leading to Scale A. This is the only case when no gravitational energy is led out.

2. Using Scale B, pull the pendulum bob via an erratic path. There is waste of energy. Some gravitational energy will be led out.

3. Pull the pendulum bob with Scale B keeping the readings on Scale A and Scale B identical. Thus the external force via Scale B does half of the vertical work. The other half is done by gravity.

4. Pull the pendulum bob with a horizontal force. This is easier to analyze mathematically. The result shows that approximately 2 parts of externally applied energy will lead out 1 part of gravitational energy.

5. Pull the pendulum bob using a force which is continually applied tangential to the sloping string. The direction of this applied force changes as the angle of String A changes. This is the most efficient way to lead out gravitational energy. However, the mathematics is slightly more complex.

We now introduce a particular way of moving the pendulum bob from Position A to Position B (the fourth way).

The horizontal Scale B is kept as horizontal as possible while being moved from Position A to Position B. This horizontal pull causes the tension displayed on Scale A to increase. This can be observed experimentally.

With this particular way of pulling, gravitational energy is Led Out. This is now known as the Lee-Tseung Pull. To be more exact, this is the first Lee-Tseung Pull on the pendulum.

The Second or Subsequent Lee-Tseung Pulls can be applied as follows:

(1) The force for the first Lee-Tseung Pull is stopped. The pendulum bob swings from right to left and then back again.

(2) During this swing, no gravitational energy is Led Out.

(3) At the highest point on the right hand side, the Second or Subsequent Lee-Tseung Pull is applied. The best or ideal Lee-Tseung Pull is to have the Force acting in a direction which is always tangential to the sloping string. During the Pull, gravitational energy is again Led Out.

Actually, human beings already know how to use gravitational energy. One example is using the potential energy of water in a reservoir to drive turbines at the bottom of the dam to generate electricity.

However, the cycle is very long. The water flowing out from the dam must be evaporated by the Sun and come down as rain to be stored in the reservoir again.

This is a very inefficient way of using gravitational energy but it is a known technique and is done all over the World.

We can shorten this cycle and thus Lead Out gravitational energy constantly and efficiently. In the case of the Pendulum, the Lee-Tseung Pull will Lead Out gravitational energy. In other words, Gravity does work via the tension of the string. This work done by Gravity goes into and is stored in the Pendulum System. We can extend this to rotational systems for much higher efficiency.

The best or ideal Lee-Tseung Pull is tangential to the string. However, the easiest explanation is the case of the horizontal first pull.

The mathematics will be explained in the following slides.

In this slide, there are three forces. The externally applied force is F in the horizontal direction. This force F is applied externally and has a value equal to ten units. The pendulum will be pulled in the direction of F. The pendulum bob will have a displacement both vertically and horizontally. When these three forces are in equilibrium, we can analyze them using the Parallelogram of Forces. The angle ¡¥a¡¦ can be calculated using basic geometry and comes out as equal to 9.46 degrees.

This analysis is usually covered in school-level physics or mathematics.

Sin(a) = F/T1 or T1= F/Sin(a)

Cos(a) = Mg/T1 or T1 = Mg/Cos(a)

In this slide, we are going to determine the horizontal and vertical displacements of the pendulum bob. The displaced angle is 9.46 degrees. From trigonometry, the horizontal displacement (dX) is equal to the length of the string (L) multiplied by Sin(a). The vertical displacement (dH) is equal to L minus Y which is L minus L multiplied by Cos(a).

In physics, the work done by movement is equal to the force applied multiplied by the displacement of the object. This calculation uses vector mathematics. By ¡¥vector mathematics¡¦, we mean that the direction needs to be taken into account.

One common way is:

(1) To resolve the force into it¡¦s vertical and horizontal components.

(2) To resolve the displacement into it¡¦s vertical and horizontal components.

(3) The horizontal work done is equal to the horizontal component of the force multiplied by the horizontal displacement. In this case, the horizontal work done is equal to F multiplied by L multiplied by the Sine of angle ¡¥a¡¦.

(4) The vertical work done is equal to the vertical component of the force multiplied by the vertical displacement. In this case, the vertical work done is equal to Mg multiplied by L multiplied by (1 minus the Cosine of angle ¡¥a¡¦).

It is important to realize that horizontal force cannot do vertical work because the direction of the force and the direction of displacement are at right angles to each other. Thus the vertical work is not done by the supplied horizontal force.

One common mistake is to assume that all energy supplied is from the horizontal pull without doing the detailed force, work and energy analysis.

After we substitute the chosen values, the horizontal work performed by F has a value of 16.10728 joules.

The vertical work performed by the string has a value of 8.00469 joules.

The ratio of horizontal energy to vertical energy is thus 16.10728 divided by 8.0069 which equals 2.010.

Therefore, approximately 2 parts of horizontal energy Lead Out one part of vertical energy. This is the essence of the Lee-Tseung Theory.

In this slide, we summarize what we have discussed so far.

When we pull the pendulum with a horizontal force F, the horizontal component of the tension of the string T1 x Sin(a) will be equal to F. There will be no further motion. However, work has been done by the external force F and the amount of this work is equal to F x L x Sin(a).

At the same time, the pendulum bob also has a vertical displacement dH. The vertical component of the tension of the string T1 x Cos(a) is responsible for moving the bob upwards. At the point of equilibrium, T1 x Cos(a) is equal to the weight of the bob (Mg, 60 units).

The work done is different from that provided by the external horizontal force F.

The vertical work is actually done by Gravity via the string. Thus we say that the external force F, leads out gravitational energy. This cycle is very short. We do not need to wait for water to evaporate and come down as rain again as in the case of a hydro-electric scheme.

We should use this Lead-Out energy. It is pollution free, abundant and virtually inexhaustible.

In this slide, we show the correct application of the Law of Conservation of Energy. Note the word ¡¥correct¡¦.

Previously, scientists did not realize that gravitational energy could be led out from a pendulum system. They wrongly assumed that the output energy must be less than the supplied horizontal energy.

With the new understanding, we now know that 2 units of supplied horizontal energy will lead out an extra 1 unit of gravitational energy. Three units of energy enter the pendulum system. From the Law of Conservation of Energy, 3 units of energy must come out.

With these 3 units of output energy, 2 units can be fed back to the input. One unit can be used to do work or generate electricity. The 2 units fed back could lead out another 1 unit of gravitational energy again.

Thus theoretically, we can supply an initial 2 units of energy to such a machine. This machine could keep leading out gravitational energy for us to use. Such a machine is not the impossible ¡¥perpetual motion¡¦ machine that does not need energy. Such a machine needs energy. The energy it uses is the gravitational energy that already surrounds us.

This is the most important contribution of Lee-Tseung to the development of New or Lead-Out-Energy Machines.

Once the concept of ¡§Lead Out¡¨ energy is accepted, the many existing and new Over Unity Inventors will no longer have any problem with the Patent Offices.

These inventors are not developing machines which violate the Law of Conservation of Energy. They are not developing the impossible ¡¥perpetual motion¡¦ machines.

They are only using existing gravitational energy (or electron motion energy).

In this slide, we extend our examination of the leading out of energy to include magnetic energy.

A magnet replaces the bob of the simple pendulum. Optionally, magnetic shielding material can be added to improve the effect. In the figure, the South Pole of the magnetic pendulum is attracted by the North Pole of a permanent magnet at the bottom and repelled by the South Pole of a permanent magnet at the top.

This effectively increased the gravitational constant (g). The value can be much more than 9.81 meters per second per second.

If we can extract or lead-out gravitational energy, we can indeed extract or lead-out magnetic energy in a similar fashion.

Magnetism is a result of circular electron motion. Thus ¡§Leading Out¡¨ magnetic energy can be equated to ¡§Leading Out¡¨ electron-motion energy. We shall discuss this concept more in a following slide.

In this slide, we extend the concept to rotational systems.

The unbalanced wheel shown on the left hand side of this slide, has a small weight attached to the rim. When we give a small clockwise rotation to the wheel and let go, the wheel will rotate back in an anti-clockwise direction. If we focus on the small weight, the action is the same as the simple pendulum bob.

If we consider one complete revolution of the unbalanced wheel, we find that during the part of the rotation when the weight is rising, the unbalanced wheel slows down due to the small weight attached to the rim. During the part of the rotation where the weight is moving downwards, the unbalanced wheel will speed up. This slowing down and speeding up produces a pulse that can lead out gravitational energy. In the 17^th century, a watchmaker in Germany produced a Bessler wheel. That 16-foot wheel claimed to be able to lift small weights and kept rotating for 54 days. Theoretically, it is possible because the Bessler wheel might just be an unbalanced wheel.

On the right hand side, we have a balanced wheel. We can have multiple pulse points on this balanced wheel. The balanced wheel can rotate at high speed. Thus we can lead out much more energy. If we have magnets on the wheel pulsed by electromagnets and if we surround the device with suitable magnetic fields, we can draw out both gravitational energy and magnetic energy.

Many documented and demonstrated Lead-Out-Energy devices use these rotating magnets in pulsing magnetic fields. Some of these prototypes will be discussed in the following slides.

In this slide, as promised, we emphasize again, Electron Motion Energy.

(1) When an electron moves in a circular orbit, it creates magnetism. Magnetism is related to electron motion.

(2) When electrons jump from one orbit to another, they can emit light or electromagnetic waves. The Laser is a well-known example.

(3) Electrons can be detached from the atoms of some elements and cluster together. This clustering produces electrostatics.

(4) Electron flow creates the AC or DC current that we use daily.

(5) Electrons exist in all atoms. They are moving around the nuclei all the time. If they stop moving, they might be attracted and fall into the nucleus. We are using the existing energy of moving electrons.

(6) The electrons keep exchanging energy with their surroundings. An example is the black body radiation. All material emits or absorbs light or electromagnetic waves all the time.

(7) Chemical Energy is due to the different configuration of the electron clouds of different compounds.

(8)

(9)

(10)

If we can lead out energy from a magnetic pendulum, we should be able to lead out energy from an electrostatic pendulum. Thus, we use the term ¡V leading out energy from electron motion.

In this slide, we essentially summarize the steps discussed previously and project some more.

(1) We are immersed in Gravitational and Electron-motion Fields.

(2) Pulsing a Pendulum Leads-Out Gravitational Energy.

(3) Pulsing a Magnet Pendulum can Lead-Out Electron-motion (magnetic) energy.

(4) An unbalanced rotating wheel is equivalent to a pulsed pendulum.

(5) Pulsing a balanced rotating wheel will Lead-Out Gravitational or Electron-motion Energy efficiently.

(6) Inventions from Wang, Newman, Bedini, etc. used pulsed rotating unbalanced or balanced wheels as described in points 4 and 5.

(7) A Flying Saucer does not need to eject gases but can use inertial propulsion instead.

(8) A Flying Saucer uses New Energy and no fossil fuel

We shall discuss Flying Saucers briefly in the next four slides.

In this slide, a rectangular spaceship is moving with constant velocity towards the left.

A person inside sends two balls with equal mass at equal velocity in directions perpendicular to the velocity of the spaceship.

The top ball hits a padded wall. The Force is given by the rate of change of momentum and is assumed to be F1.

The bottom ball hits a hard surface. The Force is F2. These forces are different because the force of any impact depends on how long the impact takes. The longer it takes for the impact to complete, the lower the force produced by the impact. Air bags in cars reduce the impact force on a passenger by lengthening the time of the impact.

In our case, due to the lower ball striking a hard, unyielding surface, the force

F2 is greater than F1 and so there is a net force F3 = (F2 ¡V F1) in the direction of F2.

It is clear that it is possible to exert a force with all of the action taking place inside the spaceship without ejecting any material from the spaceship to the outside.

A Flying Saucer can be designed and implemented easily if we have:

(1) A mechanism that provides unlimited amounts of energy; and

(2) An inertial propulsion system which does not need to eject material from the craft.

We now have both of these mechanisms. There are over 300 claimed Lead-Out-Energy inventions using Lead-Out Gravitational or Electron-motion Energy. There are at least 100 inertial propulsion systems in the US patent database alone.

The most practical Flying Saucer inertial propulsion system is likely to use the circular motion of a magnet. Magnetic attraction is used to keep the magnet rotating in a circular motion. When the magnetic attraction force is cut (or changed to repulsion), the magnet will fly away tangentially at high velocity. This can provide the propulsion force without the magnet actually leaving the device.

In the above figure, we show the design principle of a Magneto-Propulsion Unit (MPU).

The four rectangles marked ¡¥a¡¦ are programmable electromagnetic coils. They are stationary in the inner cylinder ¡¥b¡¦.

The magnetic ball ¡¥c¡¦ can rotate within the cylinder ¡¥d¡¦ driven in a circular motion by the magnetic attracting forces of the electromagnetic coils a. This movement is effectively a Lead-Out-Energy device. Some of the Lead-Out-Energy can be extracted via the programmable electromagnetic coils a.

The magnetic ball c glides on the surface of the stationary inner cylinder b. The speed of the magnetic ball can be very high.

When the magnetic attraction force is cut (or turned into a repulsion force), the magnetic ball c will fly away in the tangential direction along the angle shaped section of housing marked ¡¥e¡¦. It will hit the surface of e providing an effective thrust force which in this case, will move the unit downwards. If the housing is rotated to move

the angle section e to a different position, then the thrust force can be directed in any direction.

After each impact, t

he magnetic ball is pulled back into its circular motion by the electromagnets and the process is repeated indefinitely.

Two of these MPUs can work in unison to provide smooth motion of the vehicle.

There are some comments on the simple MPU design:

(1) The moving ball magnet ¡¥c¡¦ must be encased in a suitable material in order to avoid it breaking up or losing magnetism.

(2) The MPUs should operate in pairs so as to provide smoother motion.

(3) There must be a monitoring mechanism to detect the position of the ball magnet c.

(4) There must be a computer program to control the MPUs.

There are over 100 known patents classified as ¡¥perpetual motion¡¦ machines in China. China has a different policy than the USA in dealing with perpetual motion machine patent applications. China grants the patent if there is a working prototype.

The Lee-Tseung patents are very special. These patents explain the source of energy as from gravity or from electron motion. Thus the claim is that such inventions are not the impossible perpetual motion machines which claim to create energy from nothing. Instead, the claim is that such inventions Lead-Out existing Gravitational or Electron-motion Energy.

If the Patent Offices accept such an explanation, many previously rejected patents might become active again. Patent laws do not demand explanation of the theory of the invention. This will spell headache for Patent Offices all over the World.

Tseung and his colleagues contacted many inventors, as they believe that they can use the working prototypes of others to justify their theory.

The website for the China Patent Office is displayed at the bottom of this slide:

http://211.157.104.66/sipo/zljs/default.htm

Searches can be done using the Chinese Names of the Inventors or other keywords on the appropriate fields.

Mr

Tseung and his colleagues made an in-depth examination of the following:

1. The Electricity Magnifier from the Tsinghua University in China

2. The Electricity Generator of Mr. Wang Shenhe of China

3. The Electricity Generator of Dr. Liang Xingren of China

4. The Electric Car of Mr. Cao Qingshan of China

5. The 225HP Pulse Motor from the USA

6. The EBM machine from Hungary (delivery to China in 2009)

The details of these devices will be covered in the following slides.

The first invention is the Electricity Magnifier from the Tsinghua University of China. The inventor is over 80 years old. This invention is working in a factory. The main part of the invention consists of 3 coupled cylinders. The magnification is in three stages. The overall magnification was approximately 30 times (COP = 30).

Tsinghua University has had the information on which this design is based, since 1995. They videotaped the device and measured its input and output. Before the Lee-Tseung theory was developed, the professors and researchers at Tsinghua University could not figure out from where the excess energy came. They had a video record made on 4th January 1996.

In 2007, Mr Chas Campbell of Australia showed on Australian Television that he also invented an electricity magnifier which could magnify an electrical input by a factor of 10 times. Mr. Campbell used gears and flywheels instead of cylinders.

The basic explanation which applies to both of these devices is the Leading Out of energy from gravity via pulsed rotation as explained by the Lee-Tseung theory.

The second invention is the electricity generator from Mr. Wang Shenhe.

In the slide above, the core of a 1 kilowatt electricity generator is shown. Mr. Wang worked on this device since the 1960s. Accompanied by Mr. Lee and Mr. Tseung, Mr. Wang went to Tsinghua University in Oct. 2006 with a missing-parts prototype. The prototype was taken apart and the pictures of the components were shown in the website:

http://www.energyfromair.com/beijing/wang3a.htm

The spinning prototype was later shown to five Chinese Officials on 15th January 2007. Videos are available. The video and actual prototype were demonstrated over 30 times to many Professors and Officials. In July 2007, Mr. Wang and others received funding. Two prototypes went into the regulatory six-month certification process with the Chinese Authorities in Oct. 2007. Mr. Wang participated in the Asia Economic Summit in Boao, Hainan Island in April 2008, as an energy expert from China.

Mr Wang¡¦s invention is a combination of

(1) Ferro-liquid rotation in a fluctuating or pulsing magnetic field coupled with

(2) The unbalanced rotation of magnets in magnetic fields.

This combination Leads-Out Electron-motion energy as explained by the Lee-Tseung theory.

Dr. Liang received his university education in USA. He worked in the Automobile Industry for a number of years.

He went back to China to develop his invention. His invention used Intelligent Chips (ICs) that can show properties of magnetic North Pole, South Pole or no magnetism. He used hundreds of such ICs to rotate a cylinder. The resulting motor could generate 188 horsepower. Such an engine was installed and demonstrated in a car videotaped on 10th Aug 2003.

Dr. Liang¡¦s fatal drawback was his not knowing the source of energy of his invention and so he insisted on using the Chinese Philosophy of Yin and Yang to explain the workings of his machine. Obviously, the Chinese Academic Authorities rejected such explanations. He also got into legal problems because he authorized many agents to solicit funds for him. These agents gave false promises and many put the money which had been raised, into their own pockets. The histories of the lawsuits can be traced through the search engines in the Chinese websites.

Dr. Liang¡¦s car Leads-Out Gravitational energy. It is efficient on level roads but the efficiency drops with the angle of tilt. Using it to climb up a steep slope is not advised. His latest known project is an electricity generator in Hainan Island supported by funding from Singapore.

Mr. Cao improved Dr. Liang¡¦s car design by adding banks of batteries which kick in when the car is climbing slopes.

The factories of Cao and Liang are in the same town in China. Mr. Cao, unlike Mr. Liang, did not claim that the cars were perpetual motion machines. He only claimed that they were energy efficient electric cars.

Mr. Lee Cheung Kin spent a week at the Cao factory and confirmed that the car was not a hoax. The most important achievement of Mr. Cao was driving over 1,500 Km to Beijing with media coverage which included China¡¦s Official CCTV 10. Videos of that trip are available.

Demonstration vehicles, including a 45-seat bus, are already available. Prototypes are being turned into production vehicles.

This is the 225 Horsepower Pulse Motor from the USA. See http://www.jfg.us.com (This website needs written permission to enter) for their funding source information.

One of the people funding this motor is Chinese. They learned about Mr. Tseung and his colleagues through the Internet. The inventor has had the working prototype since 1992. He had visitors from the top universities in USA including Harvard, MIT, Stanford etc. trying to explain the source of energy to no avail.

The Chinese Group told Mr. Tseung and his colleagues, that they represented the Chinese Government and could take care of all funding needs.

Mr. Tseung and his colleagues took them to Tsinghua University and explained the detailed working of their invention.

It is just Pulsed Rotation in Magnetic fields. The electromagnets on the outer cylinder repel the permanent magnets in the inner cylinder to provide the rotation. Energy can be drawn out either via some of the coils or from the rotating central shaft.

The clever part is the program control. Some of the coils can be drive coils to pulse rotate the rotor magnets. Some of the coils (or the same coils) can be used to draw out electricity. The program can vary the Pulsing according to the External Load.

Unfortunately, the Chinese Group was found not to represent the Chinese Government. There was even suspicion that they were CIA or Industrial spies. That caused a major problem.

Now, the situation has changed. There is a strong probability that there will be international co-operation. Mr. Tseung and his colleagues actually received e-mails from Energy Groups associated with the US Department of Defence. http://www.energyconversation.org.

In October 2006, a group which has it¡¦s headquarters in Hungary, announced the EBM (Energy By Motion) machine. This group (Gamma Manager) is supported by UK, US, Canadian and Hungarian funding. They invited scientists and buyers to visit their site in Hungary and place orders.

According to their website, China ordered a large unit to be delivered in 2009.

From the description, the EBM engine uses a pulsed rotation of magnets in electromagnetic fields. The Lee-Tseung theory can again explain its source of energy.

There are other documented Inventions that lead out gravitational or electron motion energy even though the inventors might not know it at the time of invention.

Examples include:

(1) Chas Campbell¡¦s Electricity Magnifier from Australia.

(2) Veljko Milkovic¡¦s Pendulum from Serbia.

(3) Joseph Newman¡¦s Energy Machine from the USA.

(4) Steven Mark¡¦s Toroidal Power Unit from the USA

(5) Flux Change Motors from Japan.

(6) Many magnetic rotation motors from various countries ¡V one famous one being John Bedini¡¦s ¡§School Girl Motor¡¨.

The following slides provide some additional information and pointers to websites. More information can always be found via web search engines such as Google and Yahoo.

This slide shows the Chas Campbell machine from Australia.

It claims to magnify input up to 10 times with simple gear and flywheel arrangements.

In theory, it is similar to the Tsinghua electricity magnifier mentioned earlier. In efficiency, it is only one-third that of the Tsinghua device. Both use three stages for the energy magnification. Both are mounted with their axles horizontal. However, the Tsinghua device uses cylinders, which provides much more mass at the rim.

This slide shows the Veljko Milkovic Pendulum.

It uses a heavy pendulum 4 which is easy to swing combined with the up and down swinging motion of a lever pivoted at 3. The resultant system claims to magnify energy 12 times.

This is a direct confirmation of the Lee-Tseung theory. However, the energy that can be Led Out is only once per oscillation. This is much lower rate of energy gain than the high-speed rotation of balanced wheels. Thus we view it more like a toy or a confirmation of the Lee-Tseung theory rather than a practical machine

This slide shows Mr. Joseph Newman who battled with the US Patent Office for over 40 years.

His invention uses rotating magnets in pulsing electromagnetic fields. He uses the same coil both as drive coil and collector coil of electricity. His device can recharge the batteries. He was able to demonstrate that his device can drive cars with no draining of battery charges. He attributes that to back emf. In reality, the Adams Motor can use a separate coil as the collector coil. Other inventors such as Bedini learned much from Newman and his device.

He did not have the benefit of the Lee-Tseung theory and thus could not really identify or correctly explain the source of energy of his device. Now, the source of energy is clear. Newman, Bedini and many others are likely to get their patents granted.

This slide shows an example of a non-rotating system. Flux change is used to Lead Out electron motion energy.

This ring shaped device has separate sets of coils around it. Suitable pulse current is passed through these coils. There is an air gap in the ring. That produces a voltage difference. Steven Mark could not get funding in USA and is currently funded by Thailand.

Other flux change devices are from Tom Bearden and his colleagues of USA and from Japan. Mr. Lee Cheung Kin visited the Japanese factory several times. He is of the opinion that Japanese products will be available on the market any time now.

This slide shows another flux change device from Flynn Research.

From the outside, it looks like a transformer. However, it has permanent magnets inside. If there were no steering current, the current and voltage on the left hand side and the right hand side would be approximately equal. However, if there were a steering current, then 1 unit of steering current will provide 4 units of power on the left hand side and 0 units on the right hand side.

Song, Lee and Tseung also have a similar Chinese Patent. Please go to China¡¦s Patent Website for details: http://211.157.104.66/sipo/zljs/default.htm.

This is an example of the magnet rotation motor. The figure shows a device known as the Bedini School Girl Motor.

John Bedini helped a ten-year-old schoolgirl to build this device for her science competition. The wheel contains permanent magnets. These permanent magnets are caused to rotate with a pulsed DC current through an electromagnetic coil. The coil also serves as an electricity collector coil. The generated electricity is used to recharge the battery. (A different explanation is - the battery is charged with zero-point energy caused to flow into the circuit from outside, triggered by the very sharp, very short voltage spikes which unbalance the local ZPE field. The batteries have to be gradually conditioned to receive this new type of energy.)

These types of magnetic rotation inventions are most common and exist in many different countries.